The Finnish Centre of Expertise in Comprehensive Crisis Management, which consists of the Crisis Management Centre (CMC) Finland, together with Finnish Defence Forces International Centre (FINCENT), ran a Training Course on Security Sector Reform (SSR) from 16-19 November 2010 in Kuopio, Finland. This four-day residential course was carried out in collaboration with ISSAT.
The Finnish Centre of Expertise in Comprehensive Crisis Management, which consists of the Crisis Management Centre (CMC) Finland, together with Finnish Defence Forces International Centre (FINCENT), ran a Training Course on Security Sector Reform (SSR) from 5-9 September 2011 in Tuusula, Finland. This four-day residential course was carried out in collaboration with the International Security Sector Advisory Team (ISSAT) of the Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF).
The course brought together approximately 20 participants currently working, or planning to work on SSR. Some participants also included Finnish nominees to the EU SSR Roster.
Main objectives of the course included:
The Finnish Centre of Expertise in Comprehensive Crisis Management, which consists of the Crisis Management Centre (CMC) Finland, together with Finnish Defence Forces International Centre (FINCENT), in cooperation with the Netherlands, ran an advanced Training Course on Security Sector Reform (SSR) from 15-18 November 2011 in Kuopio, Finland. This course was carried out in collaboration with ISSAT.
The main objective of this training was to provide participants with opportunities to learn about the key processes in SSR through a series of hands-on exercises in which they were exposed to many of the tools and techniques that SSR practitioners use on the ground. The course focused both on technical and political aspects of SSR and aimed at broadening both knowledge and skills.
The Finnish Centre of Expertise in Comprehensive Crisis Management, which consists of the Crisis Management Centre (CMC) Finland, together with Finnish Defence Forces International Centre (FINCENT), ran a Training Course on Security Sector Reform (SSR) from 11-14 September 2012 in Tuusula, Finland. This four-day residential course was carried out in collaboration with the International Security Sector Advisory Team (ISSAT) of the Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF).
The course brought together approximately 20 participants currently working, or planning to work on SSR. The allocation of course seats was divided equally among partners, including foreign participants.
The Ministry for Foreign Affairs promotes the security and welfare of Finland and the Finns, and works for a secure and fair world. The Ministry for Foreign Affairs concentrates on foreign and security policy, trade policy and development policy as well as on significant foreign policy issues and international relations in general. The Ministry also assists other branches of government in the coordination of international affairs.
As one of the Ministries of the Finnish Government and leading authority in the area of national defence, the Ministry of Defence is in charge of national defence policy and national security as well as of international cooperation in defence policy matters.
The Ministry for Foreign Affairs concentrates on foreign and security policy, trade policy and development policy as well as on significant foreign policy issues and international relations in general. The Ministry also assists other branches of government in the coordination of international affairs.
| Course | Dates | Language |
|---|---|---|
| Introductory Course to SSR | 06 September - 09 September 2011 | English |
| Advanced Course on SSR | 14 November - 18 November 2011 | English |
| Introductory Course to SSR | 11 September - 14 September 2012 | English |
DCAF's newest addition to its SSR series has just been published, co-authored by Albrecht Schnabel and Marc Krupanski and titled "Mapping Evolving Internal Roles of the Armed Forces." It is widely assumed, at least from a Western perspective, that the armed forces provide national defence against external threats. In reality, within many consolidated Western democracies the armed forces are assuming an increasingly wide range of internal roles and tasks. These can include domestic security roles and the provision of humanitarian assistance in situations of natural or humanitarian catastrophe, often under the command and control of different civilian agencies. This SSR Paper seeks to make sense of this complex reality. Different internal roles of armed forces are analysed, drawing on the cases of Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States of America. Through carefully examining evolving internal roles and identifying patterns and lessons from these experiences, this SSR Paper provides an important contribution to understanding the evolving nature of contemporary armed forces.
There have been considerable developments in security-policy thinking since the end of the Cold War, and a complex set of transnational threatsand challenges necessitates new security policies and strategies. Not only the attacks of 11 September 2001, but also the dark side of globalisation such as climate change, the global spread of dangerous technologies and international organised crime have changed the security perspective and policy procedures in recent years. Consequently, new
national-security strategies, white papers and security-policy documents have been drafted in order to take into account the changing security landscape.
On 6 April 2009, the Geneva Centre for Security Policy (GCSP) welcomed a group of leading security experts for a seminar entitled “Security Strategies Today : Trends and Perspectives”. The goal of the seminar was to provide a forum for experts from different European states, major international powers and regional and international organisations to take stock of current security polices in the European region and beyond. The participants had an opportunity to assess the direction of security-policy thinking by analysing a number of key security-policy documents such as national-security strategies, defence concepts and white papers, among others. Assumptions regarding future threats were considered, as were a variety of drafting processes and methodologies.
More than 30 participants attended the seminar, including representatives of the Defence Ministries of Finland, Germany and Sweden, as well as representatives of the United Nations (UN), the European Union (EU) and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). In addition to faculty members from the GCSP, regional and international experts from a range of academic and policy institutions participated, including speakers from PricewaterhouseCoopers, the International Affairs Institute (Rome), the Institute for International Strategic Studies (Beijing), the Royal Institute of International Relations (Brussels) and the Foundation for Strategic Studies (Paris).
Countries emerging from armed conflict or authoritarian rule face difficult questions about what to do with public employees who perpetrated past human rights abuses and the institutional structures that allowed such abuses to happen. Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societiesexamines the transitional reform known as "vetting" -- the process by which abusive or corrupt employees are excluded from public office. More than a means of punishing individuals, vetting represents an important transitional justice measure aimed at reforming institutions and preventing the recurrence of abuses. The book is the culmination of a multiyear project headed by the International Center for Transitional Justice that included human rights lawyers, experts on police and judicial reform, and scholars of transitional justice and reconciliation. It features case studies of Argentina, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Czech Republic, El Salvador, the former German Democratic Republic, Greece, Hungary, Poland, and South Africa, as well as chapters on due process, information management, and intersections between other institutional reforms.
The changing nature of conflict and the increase in intrastate conflict during the 1990s, followed by its slow decline since the turn of the century, have led to changing priorities in the field of conflict resolution. No longer is the international community solely concerned with resolving existing conflicts; it also is managing emerging conflicts to ensure that they do not flare into violent conflict.This book outlines some of the strategies parliaments and parliamentarians can adopt to reduce the incidence of conflict and effectively manage conflict when it does emerge. It is hoped that by developing a better understanding of the nexus between parliament, poverty, and conflict parliamentarians will be more aware of the array of options open to them as they seek to contribute to conflict management in conflict-affected societies.